This is a locked chapterChapter 39 - The Story of Jiro
About This Chapter
This chapter opens with a discussion of the concept of a second opinion. A second opinion is a person who has a different opinion from the first one. For example, if the first person's opinion is correct and the second person is correct, then the person with the second opinion should have the right to change his or her opinion. In other words, if a person has a doctor's second opinion and the first doctor has the first opinion, then there's no need for a second doctor. The second doctor should be able to make a second diagnosis without having to ask a new doctor to do so. This is a common practice in the English-speaking world, where people ask a doctor to give another opinion after a doctor has given a first opinion. The first opinion is the one that the doctor gave the first time, so it's important that the second doctor have the same opinion as the first. So, for example, a doctor who has given the wrong opinion to a patient might have to ask for another opinion from another doctor. This would be like asking a new dentist to give a new opinion on a patient who has had a heart attack. The doctor would then have to explain why the patient had the heart attack and why they didn't know what it was. The other doctor would have to say that the patient's condition wasn't as bad as it first appeared and that there was no reason for the patient to have it. So the doctor would explain why he gave the wrong diagnosis and then the patient would have another opinion. This way
This is a locked chapterChapter 39 - The Story of Jiro
About This Chapter
This chapter opens with a discussion of the concept of a second opinion. A second opinion is a person who has a different opinion from the first one. For example, if the first person's opinion is correct and the second person is correct, then the person with the second opinion should have the right to change his or her opinion. In other words, if a person has a doctor's second opinion and the first doctor has the first opinion, then there's no need for a second doctor. The second doctor should be able to make a second diagnosis without having to ask a new doctor to do so. This is a common practice in the English-speaking world, where people ask a doctor to give another opinion after a doctor has given a first opinion. The first opinion is the one that the doctor gave the first time, so it's important that the second doctor have the same opinion as the first. So, for example, a doctor who has given the wrong opinion to a patient might have to ask for another opinion from another doctor. This would be like asking a new dentist to give a new opinion on a patient who has had a heart attack. The doctor would then have to explain why the patient had the heart attack and why they didn't know what it was. The other doctor would have to say that the patient's condition wasn't as bad as it first appeared and that there was no reason for the patient to have it. So the doctor would explain why he gave the wrong diagnosis and then the patient would have another opinion. This way