The narrator continues his argument against the plan. He argues that the plan is flawed because it does not take into account the needs of the child. For example, he points out that three years ago one of her parents was drugged, which might have made the child frail. The narrator then explains that the child in question is a three-year-old boy with congenital heart disease, a mental health condition known as Autism Spectrum Disorder, and a history of being raised by a wealthy family.